Litigation is an unsatisfactory process on many levels.
It is a blunt, costly and complex process. It fractures relationships, diverts valuable executive time and involves a significant uncapped “investment” to achieve uncertain benefits.
Before embarking on significant litigation, or even during that process, I offer a cost effective process for resolution.
A relatively small investment will offer the best prospect of avoiding the very significant costs and risks of litigation.
Importantly, most litigated disputes resolve by some form of settlement before a final hearing. Many disputes resolve in mediation, which almost always takes place after the parties have each spent very significant moneys in the litigation process.
Further, whilst the modern emphasis of many Courts on mediation is to be encouraged, it offers only the most basic of negotiation processes. The relatively formalized structure of parties mediating over a day or so, with lawyers, including counsel, present to argue respective legal positions, has inherent limitations. Resolution is often merely the capitulation of one party in face of the costs of losing of even of merely continuing.
- I offer benefits which lawyers and mediators cannot:
- I am able to communicate directly with the other parties, acting in the interests of our client.
- I can do so either on a without prejudice or an open basis, so as to foster communications between the parties and keep open the path to finding the required common ground for resolution.
- I can embark upon a course of communications, designed to avoid personal grievances and to engender trust in the process and my involvement in it.
I am not limited to a time constraint and therefore have the opportunity to explore the parties’ true concerns and solutions to them.
Importantly, I do not seek to displace any retained lawyers. I do not seek to provide legal advice. I would expect to work with the client’s lawyers, whose assistance as to the legal positions of the parties will continue to be invaluable.